On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:45:18 -0500, Will Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Yes, the ppc64 tree (that this problem came from) is backlevel; still >running with the kdb-common v2.1/v2.3 code.
Why have the ppc64 people never submitted patches to the kdb list? Other architectures submit patches which makes it possible for me to update them as the common code changes, but not ppc64. The other architectures appear on oss.sgi.com, but kdb for ppc64 is a dark, deep secret.
