Yes I applied both of those patches with no rejects. Here's all the
info you requested.
Thanks for your help. Please let me know if you need anything else.
Josh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.12.1]# gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.2/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
--disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
--disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-java-awt=gtk
--host=i386-redhat-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3)
000017b0 <kdb>:
17b0: 55 push %ebp
17b1: 89 cd mov %ecx,%ebp
17b3: 57 push %edi
17b4: 89 d7 mov %edx,%edi
17b6: 56 push %esi
17b7: 89 c6 mov %eax,%esi
17b9: 53 push %ebx
17ba: 83 ec 34 sub $0x34,%esp
17bd: 89 44 24 28 mov %eax,0x28(%esp)
17c1: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
17c3: 89 44 24 24 mov %eax,0x24(%esp)
17c7: b8 04 00 00 00 mov $0x4,%eax
17cc: 89 44 24 1c mov %eax,0x1c(%esp)
* Atomically increments @v by 1.
*/
static __inline__ void atomic_inc(atomic_t *v)
{
__asm__ __volatile__(
17d0: ff 05 00 00 00 00 incl 0x0
17d2: R_386_32 kdb_event
17d6: 83 fe 0a cmp $0xa,%esi
17d9: 77 14 ja 17ef <kdb+0x3f>
17db: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
17e0: 89 f1 mov %esi,%ecx
17e2: d3 e0 shl %cl,%eax
17e4: a9 20 06 00 00 test $0x620,%eax
17e9: 0f 85 17 06 00 00 jne 1e06 <kdb+0x656>
17ef: 83 3d 1c 00 00 00 02 cmpl $0x2,0x1c
17f1: R_386_32 .bss
17f6: 0f 87 24 06 00 00 ja 1e20 <kdb+0x670>
17fc: 8b 1d 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0,%ebx
17fe: R_386_32 kdb_on
1802: 85 db test %ebx,%ebx
1804: 75 23 jne 1829 <kdb+0x79>
1806: a1 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0,%eax
1807: R_386_32 kdb_flags
180b: a8 02 test $0x2,%al
180d: 74 0d je 181c <kdb+0x6c>
180f: 83 3d 1c 00 00 00 02 cmpl $0x2,0x1c
1811: R_386_32 .bss
000014f0 <do_int3>:
14f0: 83 ec 18 sub $0x18,%esp
14f3: 89 c1 mov %eax,%ecx
14f5: 89 74 24 14 mov %esi,0x14(%esp)
14f9: 89 c6 mov %eax,%esi
14fb: b8 03 00 00 00 mov $0x3,%eax
1500: 89 5c 24 10 mov %ebx,0x10(%esp)
1504: 89 d3 mov %edx,%ebx
1506: e8 fc ff ff ff call 1507 <do_int3+0x17>
1507: R_386_PC32 kdb
150b: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
150d: 74 11 je 1520 <do_int3+0x30>
150f: 8b 5c 24 10 mov 0x10(%esp),%ebx
1513: 8b 74 24 14 mov 0x14(%esp),%esi
1517: 83 c4 18 add $0x18,%esp
151a: c3 ret
151b: 90 nop
151c: 8d 74 26 00 lea 0x0(%esi),%esi
1520: 89 5c 24 08 mov %ebx,0x8(%esp)
1524: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
1526: b9 ea 01 00 00 mov $0x1ea,%ecx
1527: R_386_32 .rodata.str1.1
152b: 89 44 24 0c mov %eax,0xc(%esp)
152f: ba 05 00 00 00 mov $0x5,%edx
1534: b8 03 00 00 00 mov $0x3,%eax
1539: 89 74 24 04 mov %esi,0x4(%esp)
153d: c7 04 24 01 00 00 00 movl $0x1,(%esp)
1544: e8 67 f2 ff ff call 7b0 <do_trap>
1549: 8b 5c 24 10 mov 0x10(%esp),%ebx
154d: 8b 74 24 14 mov 0x14(%esp),%esi
1551: 83 c4 18 add $0x18,%esp
1554: c3 ret
1555: 8d 74 26 00 lea 0x0(%esi),%esi
1559: 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%edi),%edi
00001560 <math_error>:
1560: 56 push %esi
1561: 89 c2 mov %eax,%edx
/* how to get the thread information struct from C */
static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void)
{
On 6/29/05, Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:28:57 -0700,
> Josh Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am unable to get KDB_ENTER() to work properly in either 2.6.11 or
> >2.6.12.
> >Entering kdb (current=0xc0398c80, pid 0) kdb: unexpected reason code: 0
>
> Either a patch was misapplied or there is a mismatch in the parameter
> passing. Did you apply both kdb-v4.4-2.6.12-common-1 and
> kdb-v4.4-2.6.12-i386-2, with no patch rejects? Which version of gcc
> are you using (gcc -v)?
>
> To check the parameter passing, I need the output from these commands
>
> objdump -Sr kdb/kdbmain.o | grep -A40 '<kdb>:'
> objdump -Sr arch/i386/kernel/traps.o | grep -A40 '<do_int3>:'
>
>
---------------------------
Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
