On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 17:32 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:00:46AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi. > > On Sunday 26 March 2006 21:58, Peter Wainwright wrote: > > > Is KDB still maintained for the x86_64 architecture? oss.sgi.com has > > > x86_64 patches for kernel 2.6.14 but not for more recent > > > kernels. I tried to forward-port it to 2.6.16 myself but it is > > > not giving a proper backtrace (%rsp seems to be wrong at breakpoints). > > > > > > Peter Wainwright > > > > I would find it useful too. I've forward ported it as well, and also have > > the > > same backtrace problem. I guess it's probably simple to fix, but it doesn't > > irk me enough that I've bothered to try to fix it. > > > > Regards, > > > > Nigel > > Did you have the problem with the last patch, there was > some backtrace changes that I accepted that I did not have > time to test. It would be useful if you could check a before > and after of that code. > > Regards, > > Jack The change I mentioned in the previous mail actually seems to simplify things for the debugger, since SS/SP is now saved on the interrupt stack at breakpoints. This patch seems to work for me. Unless you can find some path into kdba_getregcontents where SS/SP is NOT saved in regs?
Peter -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis -- -- Type: text/x-patch -- File: kdb-sssp-x8664.patch --------------------------- Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
