Jay Lan wrote:
> dwight at supercomputer.org wrote:
>> I've put the final version required for Fedora 9 up under:
>> http://www.supercomputer.org/public/fedora/f9/kdb/
>>
>> This would be the file: kdb-v4.4-2.6.25-x86-2-f9-b.bz
>>
>> With this rev b patch, full support of kdb is available for F9 and it
>> seems to work just fine.
Hi dwight,
Is it right the the above patch contains only these lines:
diff -ruN f9-x86-2/kdb/kdbmain.c f9-x86-2-kdb/kdb/kdbmain.c
--- f9-x86-2/kdb/kdbmain.c 2008-05-16 11:21:21.000000000 -0700
+++ f9-x86-2-kdb/kdb/kdbmain.c 2008-05-17 00:15:33.000000000 -0700
@@ -3118,7 +3118,7 @@
{
struct kdb_running_process *krp = kdb_running_process +
kdb_process_cpu(p);
kdb_printf("0x%p %8d %8d %d %4d %c 0x%p %c%s\n",
- (void *)p, p->pid, p->parent->pid,
+ (void *)p, p->pid, p->real_parent->pid,
kdb_task_has_cpu(p), kdb_process_cpu(p),
kdb_task_state_char(p),
(void *)(&p->thread),
which changed one line in 'ps' command output? That would be only
changes you need for fedora 9?
Cheers,
- jay
>>
>> The recent v4.4 patches from a few days ago at ftp://oss.sgi.com/
>> went a long way towards simplifying things; thanks for doing
>> this! But one still needs the above mentioned patch after applying
>> the common and x86-2 patches.
>>
>> Any chance of getting this integrated upstream? Say, at least
>> in a directory like:
>> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/kdb/download/v4.4-Fedora/f9
>
> Hi dwight,
>
> Thanks for your patch.
>
> I will review it and test it later. If i am not sure if i will
> integrate your patch, at least i will put it at the f9 branch
> as you suggested.
>
>
> Thanks,
> - jay
>
>> -dwight-
>> ---------------------------
>> Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
>
> ---------------------------
> Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
---------------------------
Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
