On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 04:12:06PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > > IMO something like the attached patch makes sense? > > > This fixes the problem with kdb=off (our default). > > > But I am anxious that kdb code could still get activitated somehow > > > and the machine might oops when trying to access not initialized > > > kdb structures? Could someone give an estimation how risky that > > > patch really is? > > > > I'd really rather fix the underlying problem. I have no idea what that > > might be though... > Me too...
Can you send me the .config you're using, as well as the kernel revision? I'll try to duplicate it. Can you try turning of CONFIG_KDB_USB if you have it enabled? mh _______________________________________________ kdb mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/kdb
