https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356357

--- Comment #7 from k...@web.de ---
> I think it would better to work on detecting and recovering corruption.

> MDB_NOSYNC Don't flush system buffers to disk
> when committing a transaction. This optimization
> means a system crash can corrupt the database or 
> lose the last transactions if buffers are not yet
> flushed to disk.

Are there any experiences whith using LMDB and NOSYNC?

Are there tools/ways to recover a corrupted database or lost transactions with
LMDB? They might not even exist yet, if people don't use NOSYNC.

I think that developing such a tool is out of the scope of this project.
It seems that LMDB was built around the idea of not needing recovery.

> How safe is your DB? LMDB is crash-proof on all current filesystem designs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to