https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474135
--- Comment #20 from Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell <4wy78...@rokejulianlockhart.addy.io> --- (In reply to john.liptrot from comment #19) > Why is it a problem for you if parallel downloads are swapped for > sequential? You made the argument that there are other people using your > network, so you need parallel updates to get the update out of the way > quicker so the network can return to a stable state. Sequential downloads > taking 10 minutes would not clog the network half as much as parallel > downloads taking 3 minutes. For me, the time it takes to download is what matters. None of my family mind if their videos cut out for three minutes, but they do care if they buffer for 10. I've a strong LAN, but poor internet connectivity, due to the rural location of my residence. This appears to be the opposite of Ellie's case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
