https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512375
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Vogt <[email protected]> --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #3) > >or make it possible to have just one gmic-qt that can be built for > >gimp/krita/digikam/... > > No, as we patch the GMicQt API to be compatible with digiKam API. The > original way to communicate between the host application and the plugin is > complex, slow, and not necessary (it use a socket pipeline). We proposed the > digiKam way but it have been refused by GMicQt team in the past. So my > solution works as expected under Linux, macOS, and Windows (it's not the > case with the original solution). > > Another point: we provide 3 GmicQt plugin for digiKam : icon-view, BQM, and > editor. The original solution only support the editor plugin. > > If you are curious about my patches against the original implementation from > GmicQt look here : > > https://github.com/cgilles/digikam-gmic-qt Can the forked gmic-qt be built and used with gimp/krita/... without downsides or do we need separate gmic-qts in the distro for the foreseeable future? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
