https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512687
Bug ID: 512687
Summary: Font Rendering Appears Blurry Compared to Windows 11
Classification: Plasma
Product: plasmashell
Version First 6.5.3
Reported In:
Platform: Fedora RPMs
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: major
Priority: NOR
Component: general
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Target Milestone: 1.0
When comparing font rendering in KDE Plasma (under both Wayland and X11) to
Windows 11, I consistently observe reduced sharpness, lower micro-contrast, and
a slightly blurred appearance on Linux. These differences become especially
apparent on high-resolution (HiDPI) displays and standard RGB subpixel panels.
Below is a detailed technical breakdown to help identify potential causes and
implementation differences between the Linux rendering pipeline and the
ClearType system used by Windows 11.
1. Subpixel Rendering (ClearType vs. FreeType)
Windows 11 employs ClearType, which integrates directional subpixel filtering,
perceptual contrast correction, and subpixel-specific gamma adjustments. This
results in extremely crisp vertical stems and fine-grained detail preservation.
On Linux, KDE Plasma relies on FreeType for font rasterization combined with
Fontconfig settings. Even with subpixel rendering enabled (RGB/BGR), the output
tends to show softer edges, suggesting that FreeType's subpixel filters are
either less aggressive or apply broader smoothing kernels. This difference is
perceptually noticeable, especially on small point sizes (10–12 pt).
2. Hinting Behavior
ClearType uses precise TrueType bytecode instructions and a strong hinting
strategy to align glyph geometry tightly to the pixel grid. This improves
clarity by reducing fractional pixel placement and minimizing antialiasing
blur.
FreeType allows configurable hinting (None, Light, Medium, Full), but even
under “Full,” some fonts appear less tightly aligned. As a result, glyphs can
exhibit mild blur or inconsistent stroke weight. ClearType’s autohinter and
bytecode interpreter are heavily optimized, while FreeType’s approach tends to
prioritize glyph shape preservation rather than strict pixel grid alignment.
3. Gamma Correction and Contrast
Windows applies subpixel-aware gamma curves and contrast boosting designed
specifically for LCD rendering. These enhance the perceived sharpness of
characters without causing haloing.
FreeType’s gamma handling and the available Fontconfig settings do not
replicate ClearType’s perceptual tuning. In many Plasma setups, the effective
gamma correction results in softer edges, contributing to the “blurred”
perception, even when subpixel rendering is active.
4. Font Instruction Optimization
Many widely used typefaces (e.g., Segoe UI, Calibri, and other
Microsoft-optimized families) contain proprietary ClearType instructions and
tuning that target the Windows rasterizer directly. On Linux, these
instructions may be ignored or rendered differently due to FreeType’s different
hinting engine, resulting in reduced clarity compared to their appearance on
Windows.
5. Compositor and Scaling Behavior
Rendering differences can also arise from:
* KWin’s compositor settings
* Wayland’s fractional scaling pipeline
* X11 vs. Wayland font rendering paths
* Buffer sampling or scaling artifacts during compositing
Fractional scaling values (e.g., 1.25× or 1.5×) can introduce additional
interpolation steps that soften text appearance. Windows 11’s scaling system,
however, integrates ClearType rendering after layout and scaling operations,
maintaining consistent sharpness.
6. DPI and Layout Consistency
Windows standardizes DPI handling across the system with a well-integrated
rendering pipeline. On Linux, discrepancies between toolkit DPI (Qt, GTK),
compositor DPI, and application DPI can introduce variations in effective
rasterization size, further impacting clarity.
7. Summary of the Issue
Despite adjusting:
* Subpixel order (RGB/BGR/V-RGB/V-BGR)
* Hinting level (None/Light/Medium/Full)
* Antialiasing strength
* Gamma correction parameters
* Fontconfig patches and overrides
the resulting font rendering in KDE Plasma still does not achieve a level of
sharpness comparable to Windows 11’s ClearType implementation.
Request for Evaluation
I would like to request an evaluation to determine whether:
1. Improvements can be made within KWin or Plasma’s rendering pipeline to
produce sharper subpixel rendering.
2. Additional configuration options could better match ClearType’s perceptual
optimizations.
3. There are known issues with Wayland or fractional scaling that affect text
rendering clarity.
4. Any adjustments to the FreeType/Fontconfig integration could help align the
rendering quality more closely with that of Windows 11.
I am available to run additional tests, provide screenshots, or generate font
rendering diagnostics if that would assist in narrowing down the root cause.
-------------------
Operating System: Fedora 43
KDE Plasma Version: 6.5.3
KDE Frameworks Version: 6.20.0
Qt Version: 6.10.1
Kernel Version: 6.17.9 (64-bit)
Graphics Platform: Wayland
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
