https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=241521
--- Comment #9 from Alexander <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Thomas Baumgart from comment #7) > I'm sorry, but I must strongly disagree here. A feature for which a > requirement (wish) is present but has never been implemented can't be a bug > by definition. It's a missing feature at most and thus remains a wish list > item. > > There are some corner cases which have not been specified so far. E.g. how > should the application handle multiple entries that refer to the same tax > category in the split editor? Sum them up in one split or keep multiple tax > splits? I talked with another user about the expected outcome. Applying the tax split to the category as well would be best since it makes no difference mathematically and the user had some reason for splitting in the first place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
