https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514651
Gauthier <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|LATER |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Gauthier <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Edmundson from comment #3) > I don't want us to make any other changes in the interim that complicate > things. Hi David, Thank you for the response. > I don't want us to make any other changes in the interim that complicate > things. As suggested in my OP I wasn't necessarily expecting changes to happen with the current implementation but more as something to keep in mind when the implementation of VD and/or Activities changes in the future. > One current proposal is making it so each VD lives on only one activity I know I'm only one user but I would find it very sad if this is where it ends, as it is currently very useful (if not essential) to have multiple VDs per activity. > implicitly fixing this. You could say that but it would only "fix" it by removing the function altogether which, well, isn't really what this bug report is about. And I really wouldn't want for this bug report to be used to justify any kind of inconsistency of the current implementation. This was not criticising the current implementation, only asking for an improvement to make it even better...(and was certainly not asking a change which would feel like a regress to me). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
