https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524092
--- Comment #2 from Michael <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andrius Štikonas from comment #1) > Well, maybe our capitalisation is not everywhere right but even official > documentation is inconsistent > > https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dev/dev-btrfs-design.html page uses > Btrfs (as does wikipedia), yet in the same documentation BTRFS is used in > this page https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Introduction.html I think > most places actually use Btrfs but BTRFS is not that uncommon either. Yes, it seems that their documentation starts out explicitly saying "BTRFS", but then gets lazy throughout. Before I proposed this, I went to see what it said on the very first page of the official BTRFS documentation at https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ and it says: "Welcome to BTRFS documentation!" "BTRFS is a modern copy on write (COW) filesystem for Linux" > But yes, in many cases we could switch to better capitalisation. Yay! > I don't think EXT4 is correct capitalisation though. It's either ext4 mid > sentence or Ext4 at the beginning > https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/ext4.html Okay, I'm seeing that too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
