https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380378
Simon <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|5.4.0 |5.6.0 CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Simon <[email protected]> --- My recent changes to grouping don't really address this problem. Automatic grouping: Could be a thing. A config option to group automatically by time or filename. To still also allow manual groups as well, we would either need subgrouping (that would probably open Pandora's Box) or just combine automatically and manually grouped items. I would like that, but don't see it happening (by me) anytime soon. I pondered the idea of integrating versioning and grouping as well - but gave up on it due to lack of understanding and interest. I personally use digiKam almost exclusively as DAM, so the only image manipulation I do is e.g. scaling&sharpening in BQM for publication. Point I am trying to make: I don't really know the versioning feature. What is displayed regarding versioning is set in configuration -> Image Editor -> Versioning -> In main view -> Always show... So I assume you could select both checkboxes, then manually use grouping on versions. That could maybe be unified with grouping by giving another option: Group versions together. As you noted, I am too probably not aware of problems regarding this approach. And there is this report about this functionality: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338882 And I think versioning is only available through the editor, not through the batch queue manager. I might be wrong however. This bug report is probably related: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375024 So lets keep this report about automatical grouping and potentially use the linked reports or new ones for the versioning problems. I feel like versioning on its own needs some real attention to get it right (again?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
