https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346768
--- Comment #58 from John Stanley <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Alexey Chernov from comment #55) > (In reply to John Stanley from comment #51) > > (In reply to Wolfram from comment #50) > > > (In reply to John Stanley from comment #47) > > > > (In reply to Wolfram from comment #46) > > > > > (In reply to John Stanley from comment #43) > > > > > > Sorry about the the links in Comment 41, (3); there are two links > > > > > > there, > > > > > > separated by a comma: > > > > > > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-49241 > > > > > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/140115/ > > > > > > > > > > > > As far as building, you need to rebuild three packages: > > > > > > qtbase-5.5.1 ( > > > > > > http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.5/5.5.1/submodules/qtbase- > > > > > > opensource-src-5.5.1.tar.xz ) > > > > > > kxmlgui-5.15.0 ( > > > > > > http://download.kde.org/stable/frameworks/5.15/kxmlgui-5.15.0.tar.xz > > > > > > ) > > > > > > plasma-workspace-5.4.2 ( > > > > > > http://download.kde.org/stable/plasma/5.4.2/plasma-workspace-5.4.2.tar.xz > > > > > > ) > > > > > > Assuming you already have these installed, the build order is > > > > > > immaterial, > > > > > > otherwise build in the order shown. > > > > > > > > > > are the patches included in the tarballs ? > > > > > > > > The 3 patches, three separate files, one for each package/tarball, are > > > > given > > > > in Comment 44; they have to be applied before building/rebuilding each > > > > package. > > > > > > Is your patch implemented in KDE by now ? > > > > > > Because I was not able to compile the environment until now (see Comment > > > 48), I just installed Kubuntu 15.10 in a virtual machine with > > > 'kubuntu-ppa/staging-plasma' activated. There they use the newest plasma > > > version 5.5.3. As result I can say, that the the session management > > > problems > > > still exist in that version. > > > > Sorry, for the delay. I've pretty much given up on both KDE and Qt regarding > > this, no movement at all, no one appears to care -- so, no, the patches are > > not in the latest KDE (5.5.3/5.18.0). It'd be nice, at least, if someone > > would explain why there's no interest.. > > I think it's partially due to some bugs were closed as duplicate of bug > #341930 which continued as bug #354724, there've happened to be several > discussions recently, with somewhat contradictory approach with which I > personally disagree. I tend to fully support you review request to Qt, set > +1 there, and you KDE patches look good as well, it's a shame I just came > accross these reports, just after you posted a link in Gerrit. I've got all > the KDE stuff compiled from sources, so it's no problem to try and test you > patches which I plan to do right away and give them some time of every day > work. > > Just one question: have you posted a review request with these patches on > KDE Reviewboard? I'm not sure if I have enough rights to vote there in case > patch testing is OK, but still there's better chance to have your patches > merged with the review request there. > First, thanks so much for looking at this issue. No I haven't posted to the KDE Reviewboard ; give me a day or two max to orient myself, and I'll do so. > Anyway, thank you for your efforts and apparently right fixes of this whole > problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
