https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380876
--- Comment #11 from IWBR <iwannaber...@gmail.com> --- I understand there might be people who prefer to have a read-only picture library, and only using digikam's database to organize it. In the configuration menu, there are already a few checkboxes asking if the metadata should be or should not be written to the picture files. If these boxes are checked, one could assume that metadata from pictures should prevail over already-existing metadata in the database. Maybe another option like "Always sync picture metadata with digikam's database" could be placed there. If I am not mistaken, that is the default behavior in most photography softwares, from microsoft picture viewer to Google's Picasa, ACDsee, or Adobe Lighthroom. They all write metadata on files by default and without confirmation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
