https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393109
Dmitry Kazakov <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Kazakov <[email protected]> --- Yes, it seems like the destination layer is flattened before merging. We had exactly the same problem with selection masks, so now we keep them after the merge. But i'm not sure if keeping other kinds of masks will be obvious to the user. We should answer the following questions: 1) Destination layer has transparency mask, should it be kept? 2) Source layer has transparency mask, should it be kept? 3) Source or destination layer has Transform Mask? 3) Source or destination layer has Filter Mask? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
