https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395027
--- Comment #4 from Filip <tyx...@gmail.com> --- Also, even looking into KDE's own kdm and how it could have been configured we can see that at least the font options were present: https://i.stack.imgur.com/OAeug.gif So the question is why was it not niche back then but is now. Also I would say this uniformity problem theoretically affects everyone who does not use the default aforementioned settings. While we do not have the numbers, surely this subgroup is not that minuscule in number. And in that subgroup not all know how to edit files and code. What is more, it's AFAIK not even documented how to change these settings. I do understand time constraints, among other things, as well as priorities, but sorry, I simply don't see how cold-hard arguments can possibly go in favor of the niche remark and consequently WONTFIX status. It's an issue of uniformity, it represents a loss of features related to the kdm -> sddm migration, a comparative weakness of using sddm to using lightdm and limits customization for the regular user. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
