https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396171
--- Comment #3 from Tyson Tan <tyson...@mail.com> --- The reason I didn't use a spreadsheet was because it would have revealed nothing useful. I can provide you with one tomorrow, but I will give a abridged version of the bizarre results I have found: 1A) Hardware specs and Benchmark result do not match Krita's actual performance. 1B) You'd be surprised how many machines that could not handle Krita actually had 2016/2017 mainstream grade CPUs with DDR4-2133 8GB dual channel RAM installed. 1C) But there was a Core i3-3240 from 2012 with a single DDR3-1600 4GB RAM that handled Krita super fast. And let's don't forget the super weak 2 core 2 thread Celeron 3865U with a single DDR3-1866 4GB RAM, Krita liked it too! 2A) Same generation, better CPU, faster single-thread and multi-thread benchmark, faster and larger RAM, could not handle Krita. (Core i7-3520M DDR3-1866 8GBx2) 2B) Same generation, worse CPU, slower single-thread and multi-thread benchmark, slower and smaller RAM, handled Krita very well. (Core i3-3240 DDR3-1600 4GBx1) 3) Same CPU (Core i7-3520M). Could not handle Krita under Windows. But it handled Krita very well under Linux. 4) Desktop CPU tend to work better than Laptop CPU, even when the Laptop has better CPU, RAM and actual benchmarks. 5) None of AMD's Laptop APUs could handle Krita. Not even on an performance laptop features A12. 6) None of the latest MacBook/Pros could handle Krita under macOS. But under Windows 10, a lower CPU from the same CPU family handled Krita very well. 7) Most machines were plugged in when being tested. 8) When slowdown happened, tablet signal drops were clearly observed under all OS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
