https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395889
--- Comment #2 from a.kuede...@gmail.com --- Thank you for your response. I get that you can not get sub-frame precision, but I think the interface should make it clear that the presented value is the frame number. I guess I would even prefer to have something like this 00:00:00:08 (2), where the actual time number would be the ms-value corresponding to the frame and the value in parenthesis is the frame number. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
