https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397576

--- Comment #6 from Christian (Fuchs) <k...@fuchsnet.ch> ---
(In reply to kdebuac.rhn from comment #5)

> From what you're saying, there might be no proper solution for networks
> which only support nickserv, 

There indeed isn't.

> but then any solution is a workaround. 

You specifically asked for freenode, mind, and we do support SASL since quite a
long time.

With your line of argumentation you could also call SSL/TLS a workaround
instead of a solution, because e.g. not every website is reachable via https.
In my opinion it's dangerous to call proper solutions which people should adapt
to "workarounds", as it gives the idea that there might be something better
(coming). 

Fuchs

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to