https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361691
--- Comment #11 from Sergio Martins <smart...@kde.org> --- That's cheating, that benchmark doesn't compare QLatin1String vs QStringLiteral, well, maybe it does, for 0.1 % of the code, the remaining 99.9% it's running the common implementation between both contains() overloads. For me, both runs give me the same time, can you reproduce that consistently ? I don't think it's bad to optimize the small string case if it doesn't make the big string worse. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
