https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404057
--- Comment #25 from Kai Krakow <k...@kaishome.de> --- Yes, that's my plan. But I'd like to refine them a bit first. Especially turning fsync() off seems to involve a big controversy discussion about whether this should be done or not. So I will research the side effects a little more and try to come up with a better solution. FWIW, I'd like to submit a read-ahead patch next (fixes low-memory problems), and then I'd like to fix the problem that ContextIndexingDB becomes dropped for some reason which is, at least for Martin and me, the most prominent origin of always increasing IO-pressure and memory usage. Later I'll look into reducing the transaction commits dynamically which should relax the fsync problem, and maybe even sizing the mmap dynamically (which should me possible according to some first research). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
