https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312738
--- Comment #10 from Filipe Saraiva <fil...@kde.org> --- (In reply to jackdyson31 from comment #8) > However, in my experience, every release of Sagemath or Cantor has broken > something, which wastes time. It is a great concept but if we are serious > then we might have a discussion about ensuring basic stability of common > features (and that can also include the Sagemath people so that they don't > keep changing basic stuff). You are right about it. Cantor has a great concept and it is easy to implement new backends, however, it is hard to just one person to maintain those lot of backends. The author needs to track changes in each of those 10 programming languages in several versions and keep all of them working correctly. So, that is impossible for a person working at least 6 hours/week to do this work alone. If you want to help, you can to step forward and be the maintainer of some backend [1]. Or help correctly informing the version of the programming language utilized, the version of Cantor utilized, and provide some step-by-step example of how to reproduce your bug in a new bug report. I am doing my best to fix the bugs related and keep the software working, but I can not to do everything alone. [1] https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=cantor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
