https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435564

Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |metzping...@gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> ---
Well, digiKam cannot control the hardware clock directly. It would be to test
what would happen if we gave the tasks a higher priority. However, there are
also a lot of database accesses and these relieve the required CPU core again
in the meantime. But do we really want to make the computer inoperable when
digiKam is running?

Maik

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to