https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435564
Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |metzping...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> --- Well, digiKam cannot control the hardware clock directly. It would be to test what would happen if we gave the tasks a higher priority. However, there are also a lot of database accesses and these relieve the required CPU core again in the meantime. But do we really want to make the computer inoperable when digiKam is running? Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.