https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341143
--- Comment #450 from michel <miz...@web.de> --- Another small addendum: It is important to counterbalance the market-dominating global players by clearly showing them that they cannot deal with their "dependents" as they please; not all PC users belong to the synchronized lemming mass, but are wide awake. If this counterweight can then also keep up in principle performance-wise and on the whole also brings along a pleasant freedom, nothing should actually stand in the way of a permanent use. Also permanent word of mouth was certainly not harmful, as intensively cultivated by me for many years. Knoppix elicited more than just an "aha" from many an "ignorant" person. But the currently practiced stop/returnpath is neither a convincing argument for "new" users, nor suitable to satisfy the "old" users. Standstill means regression. The ignoramuses at KDE probably don't know that. They will learn it painfully. I don't know if Linus Torvalds will lower himself so far into the lowlands of user problems. But before I am completely finished with Linux, he will learn from me what his would-be makers at KDE are doing with his life's work, may it interest him or not. Bye Michael -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
