https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428416
postix <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|REPORTED |CONFIRMED --- Comment #6 from postix <[email protected]> --- Carl Schwan, at least your stracktrace in #2 is definitely in line with the performance data I have recorded above. Apparently most or almost all cycles are spent in (libKF5BalooEngine.so.5.85.0) - Baloo:WriteTransaction:commit() ---> (69.8%) aggregated sample costs in - void Baloo::sortedIdInsert<...>(QVector<...>&, Baloo::PositionInfo const&) (29.4%) aggregated sample costs in - Baloo::sortedIdInsert<...>(QVector<...>&, unsigned long long const&) ---> (69.8%) aggregated sample costs in - QVector<...>::insert(QTypedArrayData<...>::iterator, Baloo::PositionInfo const&) (29.4%) aggregated sample costs in - QVector<...>::insert(QTypedArrayData<...>::iterator, unsigned long long const&) ---> (69.8%) aggregated sample costs in - QVector<...>::insert(QTypedArrayData<...>::iterator, int, Baloo::PositionInfo const&)::memmove (29.4%) aggregated sample costs in - QVector<...>::insert(QTypedArrayData<...>::iterator, int, unsigned long long const&)::memmove -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
