https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419987
--- Comment #3 from Harald Sitter <[email protected]> --- A smarter person might have written out what the incorrect behavior was lol. smb->smb doesn't implement resume at all, which on the surface seems fine because partial marking only applies to "uploads" from a user POV. Except an smb->smb copy may be across different hosts at which point it'd probably count as "upload" again. For simplicity it probably makes sense to consider smb->smb copies always subject for partial marking and share much or even all the resuming logic with the local->smb scenario. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
