https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366036
--- Comment #3 from Simon <freisi...@gmail.com> --- Regarding the behaviour: Digikam does treat symlinks like "real files", e.g. every symlink has its own set of tags in the database. In my opinion it would make more sense to treat them as links internally too. So any operation on the link in the database is actually done on the original (operations on the image itself are anyway always on the original). On 24/07/16 20:44, Maik Qualmann via KDE Bugzilla wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366036 > > Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |metzping...@gmail.com > > --- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> --- > I think the sidecar should be stored in the image folder. In this case, the > "subdir" folder. And the "subdir" must be writable. I think the behavior of > digikam4.x was wrong. Gilles, what do you think? > > Maik > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
