https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445085
--- Comment #5 from oldherl <oldh...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Waqar Ahmed from comment #4) > Hmm, indeed that would work. However... the sad part is that Kate in its > current state.. can't really support that due to xxx reasons. > > See: https://invent.kde.org/utilities/kate/-/merge_requests/438 where I > implemented that but had to revert later. Maybe we can ask them to provide > insertText as well (for clients that aren't able to handle textEdits > properly atm) or maybe we can work with `filterText` since it is giving the > same info but not sure how that would play well with other servers :/ > > @Mark Nauwelaerts I do find that both that MR and the MR in KTE https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/ktexteditor/-/merge_requests/167 got reverted. However I can't find the reason why they got reverted. Is it because it caused performance drop in KDevelop? If we are going to develop a workaround, I propose to use textEdit.newText as insertText, not to use filterText. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
