https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447248
--- Comment #7 from Ihor <sytn...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Andrius Štikonas from comment #5)
> ntfsinfo --mft --force deviceNode
>
> Can you check if this command works fast? We can then switch to it too.
It works almost instantly:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
time sudo ntfsinfo --mft --force /dev/md124p1
Volume Information
Name of device: /dev/md124p1
Device state: 11
Volume Name: Media
Volume State: 91
Volume Flags: 0x0000
Volume Version: 3.1
Sector Size: 512
Cluster Size: 4096
Index Block Size: 4096
Volume Size in Clusters: 443812216
MFT Information
MFT Record Size: 1024
MFT Zone Multiplier: 0
MFT Data Position: 24
MFT Zone Start: 441274685
MFT Zone End: 443008326
MFT Zone Position: 441274685
Current Position in First Data Zone: 443008326
Current Position in Second Data Zone: 0
Allocated clusters 493056 (0,1%)
LCN of Data Attribute for FILE_MFT: 441274685
FILE_MFTMirr Size: 4
LCN of Data Attribute for File_MFTMirr: 88294
Size of Attribute Definition Table: 2560
Number of Attached Extent Inodes: 0
FILE_Bitmap Information
FILE_Bitmap MFT Record Number: 6
State of FILE_Bitmap Inode: 80
Length of Attribute List: 0
Number of Attached Extent Inodes: 0
FILE_Bitmap Data Attribute Information
Decompressed Runlist: not done yet
Base Inode: 6
Attribute Types: not done yet
Attribute Name Length: 0
Attribute State: 3
Attribute Allocated Size: 55480320
Attribute Data Size: 55476528
Attribute Initialized Size: 55476528
Attribute Compressed Size: 0
Compression Block Size: 0
Compression Block Size Bits: 0
Compression Block Clusters: 0
Free Clusters: 283662933 (63,9%)
sudo ntfsinfo --mft --force /dev/md124p1 0,06s user 0,04s system 14% cpu 0,713
total
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(In
reply to Andrius Štikonas from comment #6)
> Also partition size might be wrong because nobody worked on RAID support for
> partitionmanager. So something might be going wrong there.
Intel RAID (half-software) could be harder to implement than real hardware RAID
(hardware controller shows it to system as single volume).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
