https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448035
--- Comment #2 from Duns <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1) > It would > be easy to ignore the symlink files. and how? > However, we then possibly break the > behavior of users who use symlinks to bring images into the collection from > "outside". I am the only user. > And yes, digiKam can have the same image multiple times in the database > without any problems. You can even assign your own metadata to the symlink > images. But exactly this is the problem: that metadata assigned to a symliking image sometimes are not written in the (physical/real) symlinked image. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
