https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
kd3.mat...@reborn.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kd3.mat...@reborn.com
--- Comment #10 from kd3.mat...@reborn.com ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #6)
> Unsure what to do about this one.
>
> It turns white because *everything* using the highlight color turns white
> when its list item is highlighted. So if we didn't do this, the icon would
> be very difficult to distinguish from the selection background. Which it was
> before.
>
> On the other hand, I agree that it looks rather ugly right now. So
> apparently people preferred the old state that was technically more buggy.
Well, calling it "more buggy" implies that it makes sense for the folder icons
to follow the selection/accent color... But it doesn't, because of the current
design of the icon itself, which is only distinguishable from the background by
its color.
Also, accent colors are very nice, but also "stronger" than the default blue
selection: I feel that imposing them to folders (which are by far the most
common icons on the screen) is "too much" and less easy on the eye.
At least in the absence of a real solution, I'd rather not change the folders'
color at all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
