https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454040
Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #149008|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> ---
Created attachment 149209
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=149209&action=edit
memcheck memmem tests
> > I wrote a testcase that fails before the patch (on s390x) and succeeds
> > afterwards. It would be nice to add it so we check the same isn't an issue
> > on other arches and to test our own memmem intercept.
> Great! Do we also want to check cases where memcheck is expected to complain
> about the use of uninitialized values in memmem?
Good idea. But that turned out trickier than expected. Since there are multiple
different memmem implementations some of which call overridden memchr and now
we have an actual memmem override for s390x matching on the backtrace is hard.
So the two uninit needle and uninit haystack testcases just filter on the main
file line numbers.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
