https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369468
Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroqui...@skynet.be> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |philippe.waroquiers@skynet.
| |be
--- Comment #1 from Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroqui...@skynet.be> ---
Created attachment 101438
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101438&action=edit
slightly reworked patch, with an alternative implementation of
HT_remove_at_Iter
Find attached a slightly reworked patch (in m_hashtable.c) :
Instead of maintaining in HT_Next iterPrevNode and iterPrevChain,
the previous chain and previous node are calculated in VG_(remove_at_Iter).
This has no performance impact on existing usage of VG_(HT_Next).
On the performance test of the auto free pool, this is also slightly faster (a
few percents).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
