https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474851
--- Comment #9 from fehler-im-progr...@posteo.de --- *Hello Bernd,* Status = Resolved! You write: /I must admit I am still confused by your three-track setup. I get two but don't understand the need for the third. The "brighter, then normal" effect is also doable with Exposure./ Just not. "Brightness" makes the WHOLE image bright. I wanted only the faces to be bright. See attachment (first GLOW, then BRIGHTNESS). *Regards Johannes* Am 28.09.23 um 20:52 schrieb Bernd: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474851 > > --- Comment #8 from Bernd<bern...@yahoo.com> --- > (In reply to fehler-im-programm from comment #7) >> Created attachment 161933 [details] >> Girl Faces.mp4 >> >> *Hello Bernd,* >> >> thank you very much for your feedback. >> >> >> You write: >> >> /The way you have put the clips in the timeline and used the Wipe >> transition this is bound to happen. You have not explained what you are >> trying to achieve so I am guessing here: If you want to dissolve from >> one image to another whereby the first is on the left and rotated so >> that the girl faces left, use only tracks V2 and V1 with a Dissolve >> transition (not a Wipe transition!) where Reverse is checked. This would >> fade out the left portion and fade in the right side which is the >> original image offset to the right: >> / >> >> No, I had used the Glow effect and wondered about the strange "light >> effect" on the right picture. >> >> Removing the glow effect did not help. >> >> I then realized that the combination of "Rotate & Wipe Effect" plus >> multi-tracks were responsible for this and therefore reported the bug. >> >> I solved the whole thing with "Transparency" (see video attached). This >> is how it should look. First brighter, then back to normal brightness. >> >> >> *Regards Johannes* > I am glad you achieved what you were trying to achieve. Is this bug report > still needed? If not please change the status to 'RESOLVED'. > > I must admit I am still confused by your three-track setup. I get two but > don't > understand the need for the third. The "brighter, then normal" effect is also > doable with Exposure. > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
