https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478808
--- Comment #4 from lc...@april.org --- (In reply to Jazeix Johnny from comment #3) > You're right, then let's implement it the correct way :) I do not really want to look at the existing code (you certainly know how long it usually takes to enter a code you have not written). Anyway, if a feedback at level 1-4 is stored in a std::vector<Key_peg> (where Key_peg is an enum, with three values, for black, white and nothing) of size the number of pegs in the code (3 at level 1, 4 at level 2, etc.), then the same could be done for the harder levels. A mere function could take such a feedback and return a std::pair<unsigned int, unsigned int>: how many black pegs and how many white pegs. It would simply iterate over the vector and, at each iteration, increment the proper counter or none (for the nothing Key_peg). If a feedback at level 1-4 is *not* stored in a std::vector<Key_peg>, well, maybe doing so would be "the correct way". :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
