https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475805
--- Comment #15 from Steve Vialle <stev...@runbox.com> --- (In reply to Felix Ernst from comment #13) > I am currently trying to think > of a plan that makes everyone happy. The obvious answer is right there in the feature request: "it could be built-in (as suggested x-trash), like having a checkbox "[x] also hide application/x-trash files when hiding files"." Why continue to drag this out with diversions into what "application author might expect" and "user isn't supposed to interact with"? That's up to the application developer to deal with (usually using hidden "dot" files or directories), and cleaning up after programs that make a mess is none of dolphins business. If you want to please both those who want to keep the old hidden file definition and those who want x-trash (or some other list) hidden as well, what's the problem with simply adding a configuration checkbox as proposed? Worded as above, it even documents which mime type to edit if you want finer control over exactly what is hidden. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.