https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480748
--- Comment #2 from maxi.jarvinen+...@protonmail.com --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1) > Did you reproduce it so quickly with digiKam-8.3.0 or with digiKam-8.2.0? > > Maik I used digiKam-8.3.0 and this was a different bug, so no. But good news is that the bug I reported for digiKam-8.2.0 appeared to be fixed in this version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
