At 04:29 PM 3/15/2006, David Faure wrote:

>No; our current solution which supports "N compile jobs in parallel but
>only one linking job at a time", is "unsermake". An automake+make replacement,
>written in python, and living in trunk/kdenonbeta/unsermake in the KDE svn.
>A very nice build tool (it has other features that I'll be requesting from 
>cmake
>at some point ;), but with the major disadvantage that it still relies on 
>autoconf
>for the configuration part, so it's no portable solution.

I was wondering what unsermake was....  I suppose we could create an
unsermake generator in cmake, and that could be used to do the parallel builds.

>The actual distribution over a compile farm can be done with distcc or
>with the KDE fork of it, icecream (which has a nice GUI, and an easier setup 
>AFAIK).

However, one idea we are thinking of now, is something like this:

cmake -E WaitForSemaphore semaphore_file
<some cmake command (could be a link, could be moc, or anything else)>
cmake -E ReleaseSemaphore semaphore_file

Then you could use this to serialize any part of the build independent of the 
build
tool being used.   It would be done with some sort of target or global property 
that
could be used to insert those commands around any command that needs to be
done in a serial mode.  

Then the semaphore could be initialized with 1 to achieve full serialization, 
or a higher number to allow up to N of the group to run at once.  That way 
cheap tasks (distributed compilation) could have full parallelism, medium-cost 
tasks (moc?) could have a lower level of parallelism, and expensive tasks 
(linking) could have full serialization.



-Bill
  

_______________________________________________
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
  • Re: William A. Hoffman
    • Re: Thiago Macieira
      • Re: William A. Hoffman
        • Re: Thiago Macieira
          • Re: Alexander Neundorf
            • Re: William A. Hoffman
              • Re: David Faure
                • Re: William A. Hoffman
                • Re: Michael Pyne
                • Re: Stephan Kulow
    • Re: William A. Hoffman

Reply via email to