On Monday 11 September 2006 12:42, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Simon Hausmann wrote: > > On Monday 11 September 2006 11:42, David Faure wrote: > >> On Tuesday 27 June 2006 21:16, William A. Hoffman wrote: > >>> At 02:30 PM 6/27/2006, David Faure wrote: > >>>> Basically, yes. Most kdelibs and qt header files are in khtml's > >>>> dependencies, and that's a lot of different directories inside kdelibs > >>>> ... moc needs the same as the compiler: the list of -I paths for > >>>> possibly-used headers. > >>> > >>> I don't suppose moc supports some sort of response file does it? > >> > >> Not that I can see. But if the win32 guys need it, I'm sure they could > >> provide a patch to Trolltech to implement that :) > > > > Funny coincidence, I implemented exactly this very feature in moc a few > > weeks ago :) . It's in 4.2.0 snapshots as well as the rc1 and qt-copy. > > > > A @ followed by a filename (moc @/foo/blah) is interpreted now and all > > the lines in there are interpreted as if they were specified on the > > commandline. > > Great, and funny coincidence, indeed. > But wouldn't a "-" option fit better into the argument concept of moc? > Already there are only "-" options.
I prefer keep this compatible with the way compilers handle it. gcc supports the @ response files, too, btw. (I think mainline only though) Simon
pgpbFp37dv75E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
