On Sunday 15 June 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 15.06.08 16:56:33, Allen Winter wrote: > > On Sunday 15 June 2008 16:15:38 David Johnson wrote: > > > p.s. I did not realize that the old style lowercase headers were a > > > political issue. I apologize for bringing up this topic. Shall I revert > > > the few changes I have made? > > > > Don't revert. > > > > This isn't a political issue... well it is sorta. Some people don't > > like using the forwarding headers were they aren't required > > because that makes compiling slower. > > > > But is an issue of having to take the time to fix something > > that shouldn't need fixing. > > > > I wonder if their is a simple "if(FreeBSD)" hack we can put > > high up in the buildsystem to alleviate this problem?? > > Well, the following woud work as long as nobody uses > > #include <QtCore/qobject.h> > > or similar. In our FindQt4.cmake the include-dir needs to get the order: > > <QtCore-includedir>:<QtGui-includedir>:...:<general-Qt-includedir> > > which would result in: > > /usr/local/include/QtCore:/usr/local/include/QtGui:...:/usr/local/include > > for David. > > Cc'ing buildsystem to ask wether that (re-ordering the include paths so > that the general Qt4-includedir is after those for the individual > modules)might be feasible.
So the question is whether the Qt-module include dirs can be can be put before the general include dir ? What was the original problem ? Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
