On Friday 04 July 2008 14:43:29 Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 04.07.08 13:25:55, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > David Faure wrote: > > >On Friday 04 July 2008, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > >> Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > >> >> I want to change this. Is it o. k. if i do this and commit this > > >> >> change next monday? > > >> > > > >> >+1 from me, the one in kdevplatform is 95% identical to what CMake > > >> > 2.6 ships so I don't expect any breakages with it. > > >> > > >> Why don't we use the official CMake 2.6 one then? > > > > > >Because currently KDE has to build with CMake 2.4 too. > > > > > >Or did you mean copying the one from cmake 2.6 for now? (i.e. ironing > > > out the remaining 5% difference)? > > > > I meant copying theirs into our sources. > > > > In other words: those 5% different, are they justified? > > Thats the code that actually depends on CMake 2.6 features :) And > recently there have been some cleanups/fixes for CMake CVS (will be > backported to 2.6.1) that require CMake 2.6. > > So as soon as we depend on 2.6 we can just rip it out completely, until > then the kdevplatform version is a 2.4-compatible mostly-identical > version of what CMake has. > > Andreas
RC1 - kdesdk break boost detection in Mandriva for kdesdk. We have our headers in /usr/include/boost and libraries are in standard /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 Was working previously on 4.0.85 Any guess ? -- Helio Chissini de Castro KDE Project Brasil and South America Primary Contact _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
