On 20.01.09 21:29:48, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Monday 19 January 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > On 18.01.09 23:33:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > ... > > > > The problem with that is when a new version is out. > > > > > > Not really, if a project uses boost, one of its dev should _check_ that > > > it still works with the newer version (As I said in the other mail, > > > kdevplatform for example doesn't build with 1.37). And if he verified > > > that, he can simply commit the change. > > > > > > IMHO you can't assume that your boost-using project will work just fine > > > with a newer version. > > Are they that bad with keeping compatibility ?
I don't have that much long-time experience and kdevplatform/teamwork compiles just fine with 1.33, 1.34 and 1.35, but I think maybe part of the problem is that its a template library and hence keeping BC/SC is relatively hard, so they simply don't try at all or just can't. Andreas -- Give your very best today. Heaven knows it's little enough. _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
