On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 21:24, Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday 19 February 2009, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > On Thursday 19 February 2009 18:23:01 Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > > > I agree with Allen -- when I compile a module, the information "you > are > > > > missing this and that" is much more important than the information "I > > > > found this and that". For the missing stuff I might have to take > > > > action. For the found stuff there is no problem, so there is little > > > > point in filling 3 screens with "I found this and that, so you'll get > > > > such and such features"... we don't list the features that one gets > in > > > > all cases, either > > > > > > > > :-) I think all that's needed is a short confirmation that "foo" was > > > > : found > > > > > > > > after you installed it. > > > > > > well, OK then. I will just use my own local copy for K3b then, because > > > frankly, I really don't like the output as it is now. > > > > Sorry, this sounds way to aggressive. And that was not my intention. What > I > > should have written is: > > No problem. > Actually I agree with you, and also also agree that your version looks > nicer. > But one of the things was that there should be only one line per package, > so > it's easy to grep for stuff. > And it's also correct that the things which were found shouldn't take too > much > space. > > Alex > How about making this an option then, that you can switch on and off, and which is non-verbose like today as a default? I too like Sebastian's work and find it very useful -- but I understand that it doesn't fit all use cases, e.g. making grepping difficult. Cheers, Loïc
_______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
