Sune Vuorela wrote: >On Saturday 09 May 2009 12:48:47 Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> > I don't think find_package(KDE4) should find anything but "real >> > kdelibs", and as the experimental parts are packaged seperately, it >> > neeeds two checks. >> >> Technically it's the same as when e.g. building plasma or khtml >> separately, so I'd like to handle it the same way. >> I.e. after find_package(KDE4) no additional >> find_package(khtml) should be necessary, but instead either >> if(KDE4_KHTML_FOUND) or if (KDE4_KHTML_LIBS) should be checked. >> Since also experimental can be built as part of kdelibs, I would >> prefer doing it the same way. > >I think you should treat it more like if it was a seperate module like >kdepimlibs.
More than that. You have to treat "kdelibs experimental 4.3" as a module.
Because "kdelibs experimental 4.4" is not enough to match.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
