On 14/07/2011, at 5:16 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > What do you think of this ? > More wishes ? > Should it do it in a different way ?
Very nice. I especially like the PURPOSE concept. As we discussed before, in connection with use of OpenAL sound in some games, could it be possible to have grades of requirement in between REQUIRED and OPTIONAL? They would not bomb out the cmake run, but should issue some stronger message that the requirement was not met than just saying it was "optional". OTOH, after completion of moves to git, maybe "medium to strong" requirements of individual apps can be made REQUIRED without bombing out the cmake run of the "module" to which they belong. I presume the Superbuild of a "module" can survive the failure of one of its cmake runs (?). Cheers, Ian W. _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
