Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 10:40:59 AM Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: >> Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > Reviewboard failed to understand `git diff -M` patch, so I'm sending >> > both the patch and the new FindUSB.cmake here. > > What's the issue with libusb 0.1 vs. 1.0 ? See http://libusb.org. Basically, a few years ago they've decided to change API/ABI, hence changed the name.
> The whole module doesn't mention any version number. I mean, it does not > support specifying version numbers (which is acceptable), but it also > doesn't say that it finds only some specific versions of libusb. I'll add a comment. Or we can remove this find module. > I'm not sure I like to have such a warning message there. libusb-0.1 is not maintained anymore. I think it is good to warn developers if they use unmaintained library. > While you're at it, the first line of the file mentions "freetype" instead > of libusb. Fixed in my local version. -- Yury G. Kudryashov, mailto: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
