On Thursday 26 January 2012, Michael Jansen wrote: > On Thursday, January 26, 2012 09:44:41 PM you wrote: > > On Thursday 26 January 2012, Michael Jansen wrote: ... > > > Why? Interested in breaking cross compiles? > > > > I'd appreciate a somewhat more constructive tone. > > And i personally appreciate people that don't get offended so easily. > > But in any case sorry if that offended you. > > > > I see not other point in doing it. > > > > In case you read what I wrote, you should have seen that I wrote > > try_COMPILE(), not try_RUN(). > > Right. But i am still missing the WHY?
It would make the version detection independent from in which file the version-define is located. > Yes we can do that. But on cross > compiles that means no version information. So will you just accept that or > keep the current code as fallback? If so then why even add the other. If > not why is that acceptable if there is a perfectly working cross compile > solution. try_compile() works perfectly fine with cross compiling, it is only running an executable which is a problem with cross compiling. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
