On Saturday 18 February 2012 18:01:26 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Saturday 18 February 2012, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Friday 17 February 2012 00:41:49 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > On Thursday 16 February 2012, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > > > I'd still go with kf5. > > > > > > > > > I think we should keep the "kde" in the string, so the name stays > > > > > present. That's why I also named the file "KDEInstallDirs.cmake" and > > > > > not "KF5InstallDirs.cmake". > > > > > > > > > > Comments ? > > > > > > > > I think kf5 is a name that kde can own anyway, and which we can use. > > > > > > I mean, "kde" is a well-known name, we should not hide it. > > > > That's trying to put some marketing details in a technical aspect IMHO. It > > should map to the product, and product code name if KF5. > > No, it's not. > See my other mail. > Currently there is no "KF5", and there are no plans to have one. > Instead we have plans to make a set of libraries which are called together > "KDE frameworks". > > KDEInstallDirs.cmake is in extra-cmake-modules since yesterday. > This is definitely not a "KF5InstallDirs.cmake". There is nothing in it > which is KF5-specific.
Sorry, I apparently misunderstood what you meant or replied at the wrong place (as you can see in the other thread I didn't ask for file rename). I was talking about the variable names, we used to have a KDE4_ prefix I just meant it should be a KF5_ prefix in such cases now. My apologies for the noise then. :-) Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
