El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va escriure: > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas > > va> > > escriure: > >> Hello, > >> > >>> Attached, can somebody give it a try ? > >>> > >>> Alex > >> > >> I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. > >> With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch > >> needed. > > > > So let's go for the cmake increase? > > > > Anyone against it? (I will need an answer before RC1 tag on tuesday night) > > I know I'm not helping, and maybe it was already discussed again so please > disregard this in case, but wasn't there a long and heated discussion about > this whose result was to go with 2.8.8 for kdelibs 4.10? And kdepimlibs is > considered "part" of kdelibs afaik.
Yes, there was a huge discussion, but if you can't make it work with 2.8.8, what's the point of requiring it and not 2.8.9? Albert > > See: > http://lists.kde.org/?t=134890793800002&r=1&w=2 > http://lists.kde.org/?t=135058553600001&r=1&w=2 > > Ciao _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
